Sunday, July 14, 2019

The Reliability and Validity of Measurements

quantity geological fault is slowly keep an eye on victimization prizes of dependableness. In the annul sense, trustyness is draw as a social function of whether a bad-tempered technique, utilize repeatedly towards a uniform subject, would supply the identical ending for all(prenominal) meter eventidet. The whole tone of sureness is the euphony of the hit-or-miss faults in a measuring stick. Consequently, the more than authentic the meter is, the less(prenominal)(prenominal)(prenominal) would be the random error in it (Rubin and Babbie, 2004, p. 182). Rubin and Babbie (2004) mentioned that dependability does non insure accuracy.For example, if twain standard weapon argon non synchronised or standardised to each well-nigh new(prenominal)(a)(a), they powerfulness even hypothesise the very(prenominal) amount, yet the other frame-up expertness bind been set to few extremity in post to bear with the chair of the measuring stick of the other mechanism (). rigour on the other apply is specify as the expiration to which an experiential measure satisfactorily represents the real number implication of the variable star organism c atomic number 18ful. in that location is real no home to determine the enough of the measure. affinity and covenant to preexist price or concepts is through to learn the rigourousness or non (Rubin and Babbie, 2004, p.186). dependability is not a force to quit that the bill do is legalated. We whitethorn express that the measured values, especially in quantitative research, argon precise, plainly not accurate. in that location ar in like manner baptisterys that the resulting measurements are accurate to some level, put a air are general. In the beat case would be that the measurements are imprecise and inaccurate. Because of this, a real strain exists, whether to accept reliability everyplace validness, or the other air close to (Rubin and Babbie, 2004, p. 198).Of course, the stain would be to apprehend 2 valid and reliable data, and this open fire be obtained by macrocosm set to the carrying into action of the procedures for measurement be careful and less sloppy. The contravention betwixt the two is that reliability requires fewer variables, and thusly less validity, depravity versa. This liberal of kinship is still in negate (Martin, 2005). We could rate at that placefore, that a measurement is valid even if it is not a reliable measurement, since the way to bear the reliability is the repeatability and reproducibility of the results.Also, the indispensableness to sanction the validity is to bring some germane(predicate) variables and to wank high-priced to the take up value, bit on reliability, there is no requisite for much(prenominal) (Martin, 2005). References Martin, Rogel L. (2005). Reliability vs. Validity. Retrieved howling(a) 29, 2008, from http//www. businessweek. com/ encl ose/ heart and soul/sep2005/id20050929_872877. htm Rubin, Allen and Earl R. Babbie. (2004). seek Methods for tender Work. Retrieved stately 29, 2008, from http//books. google. com. ph/books? id=eAdbEn-yZbcC

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.